4.2 Policy Inconsistency Assessment Protocol for Spatial Plans (RTRW)
The methodological architecture for evaluating statutory spatial planning inconsistencies utilizes a multi-scalar geospatial concordance protocol designed to reconcile upstream land allocations with downstream hydrological parameters. Evaluating statutory plans (Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah) across administrative boundaries requires systematically cross-referencing spatial zoning designations against watershed-scale retention requirements (Urban Water Governance Through the Watershed Spatial Institutional Approach, 2020). This methodological framework pairs spatial overlay analyses with institutional boundary diagnostics to detect zones where local development permits contradict strategic catchment retention goals (Introduction to Spatial Flood Risk Management, 2022). By operationalizing collaborative spatial decision-making protocols, the analytical matrix translates qualitative zoning stipulations and transboundary catchment metrics into structured spatial layers (Collaborative Spatial Decision Making Empowering Urban Flood Governance Toward City Resilience, 2025). Spatial discrepancies are quantified by measuring divergence between designated water retention envelopes and actual municipal zoning classes across administrative tiers. This spatial-institutional protocol ensures that statutory inconsistencies are captured not merely as isolated administrative divergences, but as cumulative spatial pressures that aggregate runoff across interconnected downstream catchments. Consequently, the multi-tiered assessment operationalizes a replicable diagnostic tool for evaluating transboundary land governance fidelity without relying on unverified empirical claims or static jurisdictional boundaries.