3.1 Secondary Analytical Framework of Institutional Policy Documents and Governance Texts
This study establishes a rigorous qualitative document-analytical framework to examine how structural precarity and institutional governance mechanisms drive the attrition of early-career scholars within Swiss higher education. Grounding the analytical matrix in comparative higher education policy, the research design operationalizes both discursive and affective dimensions of scientific career friction across national and institutional jurisdictions. Specifically, the qualitative inquiry adopts the analytical concept of stickiness articulated by Tzanakou and Henderson (2020), which bridges normative policy mandates of international mobility with the lived emotional tensions and embodied frictions experienced by researchers across transitional institutional thresholds. Integrating this affective layer allows the methodological protocol to capture non-linear career appraisals and subtle disengagement patterns that remain obscured within crude retention metrics. Furthermore, the documentary classification scheme incorporates the structural dimensions of institutional exit culture delineated by Locke et al. (2025). This analytical lens conceptualizes academic career-making amid insecure working conditions, local institutional restructuring, and cumulative systemic uncertainty across higher education workforces. By mapping these two conceptual axes across cantonal university statutes, federal funding guidelines, and institutional workforce development reports, the thematic coding protocol systematically categorizes textual evidence into discrete pathways of professional capital accumulation, structural displacement, and voluntary or involuntary departure. Consequently, this methodological architecture enables a nuanced evaluation of how governance texts and funding instruments formalize hyper-mobility while paradoxically precipitating premature vocational exit.