2.1 Comparative Multi-Criteria Assessment Framework for Industrial Hydrogen Deployment
The methodological framework developed in this study relies on a systematic comparative synthesis of secondary techno-economic datasets, published process flow balances, and regional infrastructure assessments to evaluate clean hydrogen integration across hard-to-abate manufacturing nodes [1], [2]. Assessing the viability of hydrogen carriers in geographically constrained industrial valleys requires rigorous multi-criteria criteria that reconcile thermodynamic requirements with spatial logistics [3]. Rather than relying on uniform continental assumptions, the evaluation protocols structure energy balances around specific high-temperature processes, notably electric arc furnace steelmaking and specialized chemical synthesis, where process chemistry necessitates molecule-based reducing agents [2]. The analysis integrates published performance parameters across both green electrolytic pathways and low-carbon blue hydrogen vectors, accounting for variations in primary renewable energy availability, upstream grid carbon intensity, and modular waste-heat recovery configurations [1], [3]. Comparative criteria emphasize the levelized cost of delivery, space-constrained storage volumes, and downstream integration penalties inherent to Alpine topography. By synthesizing peer-reviewed technical evaluations and established process benchmarks, the framework ensures a robust qualitative and comparative basis for assessing cluster-scale industrial decarbonization trajectories without relying on unverified site-level primary assertions.