Discussion and Future Research Directions
The synthesis of multilevel integration literature confirms that migrant employment durability is structurally contingent upon the alignment between centralized welfare regulations and local organizational practices. While institutionalist analyses emphasize how macro-level welfare regimes and multi-tiered policy frameworks steer labor market access (Scholten, 2013), localized labor stratifications frequently subvert top-down integration agendas. Specifically, empirical investigations into welfare state integration reveal that national-level integration initiatives often encounter significant structural friction when interacting with decentralized municipal frameworks and segmented occupational sectors (FIDC, 2026). Furthermore, meso-level organizational dynamics and intersectional workplace hierarchies actively condition the vulnerability of migrant workers, demonstrating how structural norms compound economic precarity in low-wage sectors (Seo, 2024). A notable research gap persists regarding the vertical coordination mechanisms connecting localized institutional gatekeeping with micro-level labor market retention over extended durations. Existing scholarship predominantly treats macro-level governance directives and workplace-level stratification as discrete analytical domains rather than recursively linked structures. Methodologically, this study is subject to limitations, including its reliance on aggregated institutional documentation and secondary structural indicators, which may obscure informal coping strategies and immediate workplace negotiations. Future research should consequently adopt nested longitudinal designs capable of capturing how shifts in local governance dynamically reconfigure migrant inclusion trajectories across diverse regional settings.