Skip to content

Life-Cycle Assessment of EV Battery Recycling Pathways in the United States

Evaluation of closed-loop electric vehicle battery recycling pathways delineates critical trade-offs between thermal, hydrometallurgical, and direct recovery processes in the United States. Environmental impact accounting demonstrates that secondary mineral reclamation substantially lowers cumulative carbon burdens relative to primary extraction. Strategic coordination of domestic traceability, regional grid decarbonization, and process innovation governs the ultimate sustainability of national circular battery supply chains.

Object & subject

End-of-life electric vehicle traction battery management systems in the United States — Comparative life-cycle environmental performance and material recovery efficiencies of industrial recycling pathways

Document Preview

Review the formatting and introduction. The full version will refine the structure for the selected document standard.

Bachelor's Thesis

Degree:
Life-Cycle Assessment of EV Battery Recycling Pathways in the United States

Author:

Group

First M. Last

Advisor:

Dr. First Last

City, 2026

Contents

Introduction
Chapter 1. Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Traction Battery LCA
1.1 Principles and Boundary Frameworks in Automotive Battery Assessment
1.2 Pyrometallurgical, Hydrometallurgical, and Direct Recycling Archetypes
1.3 Allocation Procedures and Credit Accounting for Secondary Materials
Chapter 2. Comparative Environmental Impact Modeling Across US Recycling Pathways
2.1 Inventory Modeling of Process Energy and Reagent Consumption Flows
2.2 Global Warming Potential and Ecotoxicity Across Treatment Routes
2.3 Avoided Burdens from Closed-Loop Critical Mineral Reclamation
Chapter 3. Strategic Deployment and Supply Chain Integration for Domestic Closed Loops
3.1 Traceability Infrastructure and Reverse Logistics Consolidation
3.2 Technological Readiness and Intellectual Property Deployment Trends
3.3 Industrial Policy and Regulatory Incentives for Sustainable Recovery
Chapter 4. Practical Implications and Recommendations
Conclusion
Bibliography

Introduction

Decarbonization of road transportation drives massive deployment of lithium-ion traction packs, precipitating an unprecedented surge of end-of-life battery volumes in North America. Evaluating the environmental profiles of recovery infrastructures is necessary to prevent adverse ecological shifting, ensure domestic mineral security, and minimize cumulative carbon footprints across vehicle lifetimes [8].

Existing industrial pathways exhibit divergent ecological trade-offs, ranging from high-energy thermal smelting to chemical-intensive hydrometallurgical extraction and emerging direct cathode regeneration. Fragmented reverse logistics, regional grid variations, and uneven collection mechanisms complicate the consistent environmental quantification of emerging recycling facilities across the United States [2], [6].

This investigation synthesizes life-cycle assessment frameworks to evaluate comparative environmental burdens, avoided virgin material burdens, and policy incentives across domestic recycling configurations. By integrating closed-loop inventory models with technology patent trends, the work identifies low-carbon scaling pathways for United States secondary battery manufacturing [6], [8].

2.2 Global Warming Potential and Ecotoxicity Across Treatment Routes

Life-cycle impact characterization underscores clear differentiation in emissions and material retention across treatment configurations. Thermal smelting methods recover valuable transition metals but lose lithium and graphite to slag phases while generating substantial direct off-gas emissions, requiring significant secondary refining steps that elevate overall global warming burdens [8]. Conversely, hydrometallurgical leaching operates at lower direct process temperatures, shifting primary environmental hotspots toward the embodied impacts of acid reagents and neutralizing agents [8]. Direct recycling, which preserves cathode crystalline morphology, avoids both extensive chemical breakdown and thermal reduction, yielding the lowest cumulative greenhouse gas footprint per functional unit [8]. However, domestic implementation of direct recovery remains constrained by cathode heterogeneity, rapid cell chemistry evolution, and the current distribution of proprietary processing patents, which have historically focused on cell design rather than post-consumer disassembly in North America [6]. Consequently, hydrometallurgical pathways serve as the principal near-term bridge for high-purity mineral reclamation, provided that reagent recycling and wastewater neutralization are tightly integrated within industrial closed loops [6], [8].

References

  1. United States Advanced Battery Consortium Battery Abuse Testing Manual for Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Applications
    Loraine Torres-Castro, Joshua Lamb
    DOI Link
  2. Policy pathways for formalizing electric vehicle battery recycling in China: A Stackelberg game–system dynamics approach
    Jiaxin Sun, Jinglin Zhou
    DOI Link
  3. Life cycle sustainability assessment of European electric vehicle battery recycling
    Enrique Moliner, Edgar Contreras, Marja Rinne et al.
    DOI Link
  4. Recycling of Battery Technologies – Ecological Impact Analysis Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Lea Unterreiner, Verena Jülch, Sören Reith
  5. A life cycle assessment of a Li-ion urban electric vehicle battery
    Konstantinos N. Genikomsakis, Christos S. Ioakimidis, Alberto Murillo et al.
  6. Global Patent Analysis of Battery Recycling Technologies: A Comparative Study of Korea, China, and the United States
    Chae-Hoon Lee
  7. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the Wastewater Treatment Plant of a Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Industry
    Yosef Barita Sar Manik, Surya Nita Zebua
  8. EverBatt: A Closed-loop Battery Recycling Cost and Environmental Impacts Model
    Qiang Dai, Jeffrey S. Spangenberger, Shabbir Ahmed et al.

Bibliography

Verified SourcesFormatting StandardsHigh UniquenessPro Models
Launch Offer -25%

Diploma

APA 7th Edition (Publication Manual)

$18$24
  • 60-80 pages
  • High originality drafting
  • Export to Word
  • Correct formatting
  • Public Preview
    A preview by another author cannot be made private. Your work will be private and completely unique.
  • Bibliography (30+, APA 7th Edition)
    +$2
  • Add alternative sources (News, .gov, .edu)

Diploma

APA 7th Edition (Publication Manual)