The Evolution of Student Trust and Academic Integrity
Findings reveal that while ChatGPT offers significant support for content refinement and template generation, its efficacy is constrained by recurring deficits in emotional depth and critical thinking [7][8]. Analysis contrasts initial student views of AI as a 'cheating tool' with post-assignment perspectives that prioritize human oversight. The takeaway is that academic integrity risks are effectively mitigated when tools are framed as collaborative resources within calibrated instructional settings [4][5].