Esta é uma breve antevisão. A versão completa inclui texto expandido para todas as secções, uma conclusão e uma bibliografia formatada.
Autor/a:
Group
Nome Completo
Orientador/a:
Prof. Dr./Dra. Nome
The rapid proliferation of Large Language Models and adaptive learning algorithms has fundamentally altered the American academic landscape. While technological integration in classrooms has evolved over the past decade, the current intensity of adoption suggests a departure from traditional instructional models (Afzaal & Xiao, 2024). This shift necessitates a critical appraisal of how digital tools reshape the relationship between educator and student. The urgency of this analysis stems from the speed at which generative tools have moved from experimental curiosities to ubiquitous classroom fixtures. Educational institutions currently face a dual challenge: leveraging AI to enhance literacy education (Schrag & Short, 2025) while simultaneously mitigating risks to academic integrity. Evidence indicates a significant variance in how major educational groups across the United States adopt generative AI practices, often without central coordination (Montiel & Kundu, 2025). Without standardized frameworks, the risk of widening the digital divide or compromising research ethics grows, as highlighted by the disparate guidance issued to researchers by higher education institutions (Ganguly & Johri, 2025). The central tension lies in whether these technologies empower learners through personalized support or merely automate cognitive processes, potentially eroding critical thinking skills. This research seeks to analyze the multifaceted impact of artificial intelligence on pedagogical practices and institutional policies within the United States. To achieve this, the study evaluates the historical trajectory of AI adoption and assesses how generative AI influences student learning outcomes. Beyond technical performance, the investigation examines the socio-economic implications of AI-driven tools and culminates in evidence-based policy recommendations for ethical integration. This trajectory ensures that technological advancement aligns with the core values of the American educational mission. The object of this investigation is the educational system of the United States as it navigates the complexities of the AI era. Within this framework, the subject encompasses the pedagogical, ethical, and socio-economic consequences of AI integration. Analyzing these elements requires a nuanced understanding of how American higher education compares to international counterparts, particularly regarding the politics of empowerment and teacher leadership (Li, 2025; AlZeyoudi & Kamarudin, 2025). Furthermore, comparing teaching strategies between the United States and other global leaders like China provides necessary context for understanding American competitive positioning (Meng & Luo, 2024). A qualitative and comparative methodology underpins this analysis, drawing from international trends and specific US case studies (Cabanillas-Garcia, 2025). By comparing teacher evaluation models, such as those of Danielson and Marzano through an AI lens (Yuan, 2022), the study provides a grounded perspective on institutional change. The subsequent sections detail the evolution of AI in schools, evaluate current learning trends through systematic reviews (Nguyen & Trương, 2025), and propose a framework for future-proofing American educational policy against the uncertainties of rapid technological change.
NP ISO 690:2024 (sucedeu NP 405)