To jest krótki podgląd. Pełna wersja zawiera rozszerzony tekst dla wszystkich sekcji, zakończenie oraz sformatowaną bibliografię.
Autor:
Group
Imię Nazwisko
Promotor:
dr hab. Imię Nazwisko
The proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) across the United States education sector represents a fundamental shift in instructional delivery and knowledge acquisition. Unlike previous technological adoptions, the current integration of large language models and automated assessment tools is occurring with unprecedented speed, often outpacing institutional policy development. Goralski and Górniak-Kocikowska (2022) argue that this rapid deployment necessitates a critical re-evaluation of educational standards to ensure that technological advancement does not compromise pedagogical depth. Recent bibliometric analyses reveal a stratified research landscape where funding often favors specific institutional tiers, potentially widening the digital divide within the American school system (Taylor & Stan, 2024). As educational entities grapple with these changes, the need to reconcile technological efficiency with pedagogical integrity has become a primary concern for administrators and faculty alike. While AI offers transformative potential for personalized learning and administrative efficiency, its presence in the classroom introduces significant risks to academic integrity and cognitive development. Basch and Hillyer (2025) found that student usage of AI tools often lacks a foundation in ethical literacy, leading to a disconnect between technological capability and actual learning outcomes. The tension between leveraging AI for secondary literacy education (Schrag & Short, 2025) and maintaining rigorous evaluative standards remains unresolved. Current institutional guidance for researchers and students varies significantly, creating a fragmented landscape where the definition of "original work" is increasingly contested (Ganguly & Johri, 2025). This lack of a unified framework threatens the long-term sustainability of American educational standards and necessitates a more structured approach to AI governance. The central objective of this study involves evaluating the pedagogical impact and ethical implications of AI technologies within the United States education sector. By focusing on the integration of generative AI tools in higher education, the inquiry analyzes how these systems influence cognitive skill development and academic integrity. The object of study encompasses the diverse array of AI technologies currently deployed in American schools and universities, while the subject focuses on the specific pedagogical and ethical effects these tools exert on students and institutional structures. To address these complexities, the research examines current integration patterns, analyzes the resulting shifts in student cognition, and formulates policy-level recommendations for sustainable adoption. The investigation employs a multi-faceted methodology, combining a systematic review of emerging themes (Nguyen & Trương, 2025) with a comparative analysis of international and domestic teaching strategies (Meng & Luo, 2024). This approach allows for a nuanced understanding of how political and social factors empower or hinder AI integration in higher education (Li, 2025). The structure of the report begins with an assessment of current AI applications in literacy and teacher evaluation (Yuan, 2022). Subsequent sections address the specific challenges of academic dishonesty and the potential erosion of critical thinking skills. The final chapters synthesize these findings to propose a framework for ethical AI governance that prioritizes student learning over mere computational output.
PN-ISO 690:2012