Supporting Evidence and Institutional Gaps
The provincial audit reveals that local interventions for Overseas Filipino Worker (OFW) households remain overwhelmingly tethered to economic metrics, failing to address the acute relational ruptures caused by parental absence. Macro-level assessments of remittance utilization indicate that institutional programs primarily emphasize household expenditure, consumption, and financial sustainability as indicators of familial well-being (Ang et al., 2007). While economic stability forms a critical baseline, these economic frameworks overlook the socio-emotional dynamics that reshape everyday family life across geographical borders. Specifically, transnational parenting configurations, such as fathering across international borders, generate unique communicative strains, role reconfiguration, and emotional labor that cannot be remedied through financial counseling alone (Cabañero et al., 2024). Although provincial programs routinely track household spending and saving habits in areas such as Region XI (Asuncion & Belonio, 2022), municipal welfare bodies consistently fail to establish corresponding clinical counseling or community-based psychosocial mechanisms. Consequently, local institutional frameworks exhibit a profound disconnect between economic monitoring and the psycho-emotional interventions required to support left-behind children and spouses navigating long-term transnational separation (Cabañero et al., 2024).