2.1 Systematic Review Protocol of Disaster Risk Reduction Curricula
A rigorous evaluation of disaster resilience education requires a robust methodological framework capable of synthesizing disparate secondary literature, institutional policies, and curricular frameworks. Secondary document analysis provides a systematic avenue for examining the structural alignment between institutional disaster risk reduction mandates and grassroots educational execution. By utilizing structured literature review matrices, peer-reviewed studies and government disaster management guidelines can be systematically categorized according to specific thematic domains, including risk communication efficacy, stakeholder collaboration, and institutional resource readiness [5]. This approach facilitates the comparative assessment of multi-level governance models without introducing primary empirical bias. Furthermore, the synthesis of cross-sectoral evidence enables an in-depth examination of the tripartite relationship between family, school, and community support mechanisms [4]. Evaluating these interconnected systems through qualitative comparative criteria allows scholars to identify institutional bottlenecks that hinder educational continuity following extreme weather disruptions. The integration of standardized policy criteria with published pedagogical evaluations ensures that findings remain grounded in verifiable evidence, establishing a reliable analytical baseline for evaluating educational adaptation across recurrent hazard cycles.