これは簡単なプレビューです。フルバージョンには、すべてのセクションの拡張テキスト、結論、およびフォーマットされた参考文献が含まれます。
著者:
Group
氏名
指導教員:
教授 氏名
The rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) across United States educational institutions has precipitated a fundamental shift in pedagogical delivery and administrative oversight. Taylor and Stan (2024) identify a stratified landscape of research funding, indicating that AI adoption is deeply influenced by institutional socioeconomic factors rather than a uniform national strategy. This technological surge forces a direct confrontation between the efficiency of automated systems and the preservation of long-standing academic rigor. Basch and Hillyer (2025) report widespread AI usage among college students for personal and coursework applications, yet many institutions lack the robust frameworks necessary to govern such tools effectively. The tension between these innovative capabilities and the necessity of ethical safeguards defines the current state of American scholarship. The core of this inquiry centers on the integration of artificial intelligence within the United States educational system, specifically scrutinizing the pedagogical and ethical implications of AI-driven tools in higher education. While these technologies offer personalized learning pathways, they simultaneously complicate the verification of student authorship. Ganguly and Johri (2025) highlight that guidance issued by US universities remains inconsistent, creating a vacuum where ethical ambiguity thrives. This study addresses the critical intersection of rapid AI adoption and the preservation of academic standards. The primary goal of this research is to analyze the multifaceted impact of AI on educational outcomes and institutional policies. To achieve this, the work is organized around four specific tasks. First, it examines the theoretical foundations of AI in US education, grounding the discussion in the decade of innovation documented by Afzaal and Xiao (2024). Second, the study evaluates how generative AI affects student learning outcomes, drawing on systematic reviews of emerging trends (Nguyen & Truong, 2025). Third, the investigation assesses the specific challenges posed to academic integrity. Finally, the research formulates recommendations for balanced AI integration that support both innovation and ethical compliance. Methodologically, this study employs a synthesis of bibliometric data and qualitative policy analysis. By leveraging high-impact research trends identified up to 2023 (Pebriana & Setiadi, 2025), the paper triangulates student usage data with institutional guidelines. The analysis also incorporates a comparative perspective, contrasting US teaching strategies with international models to identify unique domestic challenges (Meng & Luo, 2024). The structure of the coursework follows a logical progression from theory to practice. The opening sections establish the historical and funding context of educational technology in the US. Subsequent chapters explore the political dimensions of empowering higher education through GenAI (Li, 2025) and the specific application of computational linguistics in literacy (Schrag & Short, 2025). The work concludes with a critical evaluation of the bibliometric perspective on AI ethics (Güler, 2026), providing a framework for future institutional policy.
SIST 02 (科学技術情報流通技術基準)