2.1 Comparative Policy Evaluation Framework and Regulatory Corpus Construction
This methodological framework establishes a comprehensive mixed-methods design to evaluate institutional capacity and regulatory interoperability for the Academic Bank of Credits across India's federal higher education system. To capture the multi-scalar dynamics of policy diffusion, the research design incorporates systematic textual analysis of statutory guidelines alongside empirical models of institutional mediation. Following descriptive policy evaluation protocols (Kavale et al., 2024), the investigation examines national regulatory mandates across higher education sub-chapters, specifically evaluating how foundational infrastructure, physical resources, and information repositories facilitate curricular and organizational adaptation. This descriptive policy synthesis establishes baseline operational criteria for institutional readiness by identifying structural disparities between national regulatory frameworks and decentralized university charters. Furthermore, to examine the operational friction and administrative bottlenecks within varied higher education ecosystems, the methodological architecture adapts structural equation modeling grounded in diffusion of innovation and organizational support paradigms (Patil et al., 2026). This quantitative dimension operationalizes institutional mediation, administrative leadership, and technological readiness across diverse regional jurisdictions, assessing how institutional support mechanisms influence pedagogical restructuring and credit portability workflows. Data integrity is maintained through multi-source validation protocols that systematically cross-reference policy mandates against institutional implementation benchmarks. By integrating descriptive regulatory mapping with empirical mediation modeling, the research design achieves robust triangulation between macro-level governance mandates and micro-level institutional execution across central, state public, and private institutions. Ultimately, this multi-tiered methodological approach provides an analytical foundation for identifying institutional asymmetries and cross-state student mobility constraints.