Evidence Synthesis and Comparative Criteria
This study employs a qualitative desk-research methodology, analyzing peer-reviewed literature and health policy documentation [1][2]. The primary criteria for evaluation include the scalability of telebehavioral services, the impact of reimbursement flexibility, and the mitigation of access disparities [2][3]. Limitations inherent to this approach, such as the reliance on existing policy data rather than primary clinical interaction, are addressed by triangulating findings across diverse institutional contexts [4][5].