Evaluating the Impact of Gig Participation on Student Assessment
The intersection of platform work and academic assessment reveals a complex dichotomy. While gig participation offers autonomy, it often necessitates a trade-off in the cognitive resources directed toward argumentative writing and critical synthesis [1]. Evidence suggests that assessment frameworks, which may be influenced by external factors such as learner gender, must be adjusted to account for the increasing heterogeneity of student life-worlds [3]. The contrast between the formal structure of a university programme and the fluid, algorithmically-driven nature of platform work highlights a growing misalignment in institutional expectations [2].