Evaluating Policy Efficacy
Analysis of current frameworks indicates a critical distinction between mandated inclusion and the practical capacity for implementation [2]. While policy often mandates accessibility, the translation into classroom practice for neurodivergent learners remains inconsistent [3]. Evidence suggests that institutions with embedded EDI strategies exhibit higher success rates in creating equitable learning environments compared to those with passive compliance models [1][5]. The takeaway is that accountability mechanisms must shift from procedural documentation to outcome-based accessibility measures.