Dette er en kort forhåndsvisning. Den fulde version indeholder udvidet tekst til alle sektioner, en konklusion og en formateret bibliografi.
Author:
Group
First M. Last
Advisor:
Dr. First Last
The integration of computational linguistics and automated intelligence into American secondary and higher education has transitioned from a speculative prospect to an operational reality. Schrag and Short (2025) observe that AI tools are now fundamental to transforming literacy education, moving beyond simple automation toward sophisticated cognitive scaffolding. Survey data from Basch and Hillyer (2025) indicates that college students increasingly rely on these technologies for coursework and personal applications, signaling a deep-seated shift in how knowledge is acquired and processed. This technological acceleration demands an immediate assessment of how pedagogical standards adapt to a landscape where human and machine cognition overlap. While these advancements offer personalized learning pathways, they simultaneously challenge established metrics of academic rigor. The proliferation of generative AI introduces significant risks regarding cognitive skill erosion and the devaluation of original scholarship. Nguyen and Trương (2025) identify emerging themes in educational research that highlight a growing tension between the efficiency of AI-generated content and the development of critical thinking. Institutional guidance for researchers remains in a state of flux, struggling to define the boundaries of ethical usage (Ganguly & Johri, 2025). Educators face a dilemma: embracing AI may enhance technical proficiency, yet failing to regulate it risks compromising the foundations of intellectual independence. This coursework examines the influence of artificial intelligence on American educational practices while delineating a sustainable balance between technological innovation and academic integrity. The primary goal is to evaluate how these tools reshape the pedagogical landscape. To achieve this, several tasks are undertaken: analyzing the historical trajectory of AI adoption in the U.S., evaluating the efficacy of generative models in specific curricula like legal or medical education (Li, 2025; Li & Wu, 2025), assessing risks of academic misconduct, and proposing actionable policy recommendations. The object of this study is the integration of AI technologies across the United States educational sector. Its subject centers on the behavioral, cognitive, and ethical impacts these tools exert on students and pedagogical outcomes. Methodologically, this research employs a comparative and qualitative analysis of current institutional frameworks and empirical data. Meng and Luo (2024) provide a critical comparative lens by contrasting U.S. teaching strategies with international models to contextualize the American experience. The structure of the work begins with an exploration of AI’s evolution in the classroom, followed by an evaluation of its technical efficacy across general and specialized curricula. Subsequent sections address the erosion of cognitive skills and the political dimensions of AI empowerment in higher education (Li, 2025). The analysis concludes with a synthesis of policy solutions designed to align technological utility with long-term academic standards. Through this systematic approach, the research identifies the necessary conditions for AI to serve as an enhancement to, rather than a replacement for, human intellect.
APA 7 (Danish)