Esta es una vista previa breve. La versión completa incluye texto ampliado para todas las secciones, una conclusión y una bibliografía formateada.
Autor/a:
Group
Nombre Apellidos
Tutor/a:
Nombre Apellidos
The acceleration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) integration across United States educational institutions has transitioned from a peripheral innovation to a central systemic challenge. Meng and Luo (2024) observe that while AI enhances teaching strategies through comparative efficiency, the American context specifically grapples with decentralized implementation and varied institutional readiness. This technological surge is not merely a pedagogical shift but a fundamental restructuring of how knowledge is produced and verified within the digital economy. Goralski and Górniak-Kocikowska (2022) suggest that the domestic landscape's reliance on private-sector innovation forces public institutions into a reactive stance, often prioritizing software adoption over comprehensive ethical frameworks. The core problem involves an escalating conflict between the efficiency of AI-mediated learning and the preservation of rigorous academic standards. Beneath the promise of personalized curricula lies a growing tension regarding academic integrity and cognitive development. Basch and Hillyer (2025) report significant discrepancies in how college students perceive and utilize AI tools for coursework, often blurring the line between assistance and intellectual dependency. This ambiguity creates a vacuum in institutional policy where traditional evaluation metrics fail to account for machine-augmented contributions. Consequently, the educational sector faces a crisis of legitimacy: the very tools designed to expand literacy may inadvertently erode the critical thinking skills they are intended to support (Schrag & Short, 2025). This research analyzes the impact of AI on US educational practices, specifically weighing the advantages of tailored learning against the degradation of academic standards. To achieve this, the study first examines the development of generative AI within higher education frameworks (Li, 2025). Subsequent analysis evaluates the specific effects of these tools on student cognitive growth and the prevalence of academic misconduct. The investigation also explores the broader economic and institutional shifts necessitated by this technological transition, ultimately proposing policy recommendations that align innovation with ethical pedagogy. The object of this investigation is the integration of artificial intelligence within the United States education sector, ranging from secondary schools to professional graduate programs (Li, 2025; Rui Li & Wu, 2025). The subject encompasses the pedagogical, ethical, and economic implications resulting from this adoption. By focusing on these specific dimensions, the research identifies how AI-driven automation redefines the role of the educator and the expectations placed upon the learner. Methodologically, this study employs a systematic review of contemporary literature and bibliometric data spanning the last decade (Afzaal & Xiao, 2024). Analysis of institutional guidance—such as that issued for researchers and legal scholars—provides the empirical basis for assessing current policy responses (Ganguly & Johri, 2025; Lei Li, 2025). The narrative unfolds by establishing the current technological landscape, followed by a critical assessment of AI’s impact on literacy and medical education. Evidence synthesized from these diverse fields facilitates a final discussion on balancing technological advancement with the preservation of intellectual rigor.
Normas APA 7ª Edición