Zum Inhalt springen

NDSG Secondary Use of Student Data in EMI Programmes

Secondary processing of student learning analytics represents an operational necessity for curriculum development and quality assurance in English-medium higher education. Alignment with the revised Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection necessitates rigorous purpose limitation, robust anonymisation mechanisms, and explicit legal bases for pedagogical data reuse. Establishing institutional compliance architectures reconciles internationalisation strategies with personal data protection mandates.

Ziel

To delineate compliance parameters for the secondary use of student data in English-Medium Instruction programmes under the revised Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection.

Methodik

Desk-based comparative policy and regulatory analysis evaluating institutional data protection frameworks against Swiss federal legal standards.

Wissenschaftliche Neuheit

Bridges Swiss data privacy jurisprudence with EMI educational analytics, addressing regulatory gaps in secondary learning data exploitation.

Dokumentenvorschau

Dies ist eine kurze Vorschau. Die Vollversion enthält erweiterten Text für alle Abschnitte, ein Fazit und ein formatiertes Literaturverzeichnis.

Research Article

Degree:
NDSG Secondary Use of Student Data in EMI Programmes

Author:

Group

First M. Last

Advisor:

Dr. First Last

City, 2026

Contents

Abstract
Introduction
Regulatory Framework of the Swiss nDSG regarding Academic Data Governance
Secondary Data Processing Modalities in Digital EMI Environments
Methodological Approaches to Regulatory Policy and Curricular Corpus Analysis
Institutional Tensions between Globalised EMI Branding and Data Protection Compliance
Evaluation of Student Privacy Safeguards in Blended Instructional Analytics
Strategic Guidelines for Lawful Secondary Data Re-use in Higher Education
Discussion
Conclusion
Bibliography

Introduction

The systematic governance of institutional records under the revised Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection (nDSG) establishes strict boundaries for secondary data processing in tertiary educational settings. As higher education institutions expand English-Medium Instruction (EMI) to foster internationalisation and student mobility, learning management platforms capture extensive longitudinal interaction metrics across diverse linguistic cohorts [4].

However, repurposing instructional analytics and student performance metrics for institutional benchmarking often generates acute friction with data minimisation and consent requirements [1]. Digital flipped learning configurations and collaborative virtual platforms continuously generate granular behavioral data, creating compliance challenges under modern privacy doctrines that restrict non-primary data exploitation [2].

This paper examines the normative and pedagogical tensions arising from the secondary use of student data across EMI programmes under Swiss nDSG standards. Through a policy-analytic and comparative documentary methodology, the analysis delineates legal compliance parameters to balance institutional pedagogical monitoring with rigorous individual privacy protections [6].

Discussion: Reconciling Instructional Analytics and Regulatory Compliance in Swiss EMI

The analytical integration of learning analytics within English-medium instruction highlights an ongoing tension between pedagogical innovation and regulatory compliance under the Swiss revised Federal Act on Data Protection (nDSG). In digital and blended educational environments, instructional models such as flipped learning are increasingly deployed to enhance student interaction, communicative tasks, and collaborative learning ("Fostering English-Medium Instruction (EMI) Through Flipped Learning", 2020). However, the digital footprints and engagement logs generated through these interactive platforms constitute personal data that require rigorous purpose limitation and legitimate processing bases. While higher education institutions frequently utilise EMI programmes as a strategic instrument for global competitiveness, student mobility, and international prestige ("English-Medium Instruction (EMI) as a Globalisation Strategy in Higher Education", 2026), the secondary use of learner metrics for institutional quality assurance cannot bypass statutory privacy mandates. The Swiss legal framework prioritises personal autonomy, transparency, data minimisation, and proportional data governance over unconstrained institutional tracking. Consequently, Swiss universities offering EMI curricula must implement robust technical and organisational safeguards, including automated anonymisation protocols and explicit governance workflows, before reusing instructional analytics for longitudinal curricular refinement. Reconciling the discursive demands of global academic positioning with strict domestic data protection standards ensures that internationalisation initiatives remain ethically sound, legally defensible, and academically sustainable. By embedding privacy-by-design principles directly into digital learning platforms, Swiss academic institutions protect fundamental student privacy rights while simultaneously preserving the diagnostic utility of pedagogical data analytics across diverse bilingual degree programmes.

References

  1. EMI in Algerian Higher Education: A case study on English as a Medium of Instruction Implementation.
    Khaled Chafai
    DOI-Link
  2. Fostering English-Medium Instruction (EMI) Through Flipped Learning
    Alberto Andujar
    DOI-Link
  3. EMI (English-medium instruction) in Japanese higher education
    Masakazu Iino
    DOI-Link
  4. English-Medium Instruction (EMI) as a Globalisation Strategy in Higher Education
    Asma Neelam
  5. English Medium Instruction (EMI) in Algeria: The Influence of Psychological and Social Factors on Student Engagement in Engineering Courses
    Maroua Rogti
  6. EMI in Higher Education: Initiatives, Practices and Concerns
    Glenn Toh

Bibliographie

Geprüfte QuellenFormatierungsstandardsHohe EinzigartigkeitPro-Modelle
Launch Offer -25%

Artikel

APA 7

EUR 6EUR 8
  • 8–20 Seiten
  • Hohe Originalität
  • Export nach Word
  • Korrekte Formatierung
  • Öffentliche Vorschau
    Die Vorschau eines anderen Autors kann nicht privat gemacht werden. Deine Arbeit wird privat und absolut einzigartig sein.
  • Literaturverzeichnis (10+, APA 7)
    +EUR 2
  • Alternative Quellen hinzufügen (Nachrichten, .gov, .edu)

Artikel

APA 7

NDSG Secondary Use of Student Data in EMI Programmes | Artikel | Aicademy