Zum Inhalt springen

Campus Heat-Pump Retrofit Priority Map

Decarbonization of higher education built environments relies on the phased transition from fossil fuel thermal generation to electrified heat pump systems across diverse building assets. Strategic campus prioritization requires systematic multi-criteria evaluation of building envelope condition, distribution temperature compatibility, and local ambient source availability. The resulting priority framework establishes an actionable roadmap for capital investment, minimizing operational disruption and maximizing lifecycle carbon reductions.

Ziel

Develop a spatial priority mapping framework to schedule and optimize heat-pump retrofits across campus building assets.

Implementierungsplan

  • 1.Categorize campus building stock by thermal envelope efficiency and hydronic distribution compatibility.
  • 2.Assess technical suitability of air, ground, and ambient loop heat pump architectures for institutional facilities.
  • 3.Formulate a phased rollout priority matrix and spatial decision map for campus asset managers.

Dokumentenvorschau

Dies ist eine kurze Vorschau. Die Vollversion enthält erweiterten Text für alle Abschnitte, ein Fazit und ein formatiertes Literaturverzeichnis.

Course Project

Degree:
Campus Heat-Pump Retrofit Priority Map

Author:

Group

First M. Last

Advisor:

Dr. First Last

City, 2026

Contents

1. Introduction and Project Scope
2. Project Description and Campus Infrastructure Governance
2.1. Baseline Building Stock and Thermal Distribution Networks
2.2. Institutional Policy Constraints and Decarbonization Mandates
3. Implementation Strategy and Heat-Pump Integration Controls
3.1. Dual-Source and Ambient Loop Architectural Selection
3.2. Staged Boiler Replacement and System Commissioning Controls
4. Multi-Criteria Evaluation Metrics and Spatial Priority Results
4.1. Thermal Load Profiling and Carbon Abatement Metrics
4.2. Spatial Mapping and Building Cluster Categorization
5. Recommendations and Phased Rollout Priorities
Conclusion
Bibliography

Introduction

Decarbonizing academic estate heating networks represents an urgent operational challenge as institutional mandates target net-zero operations. Electrification through thermodynamic heat-pump retrofitting provides an established technical route to replace legacy fossil fuel boilers across aging institutional infrastructure (Curran et al., 2024; Rivoire et al., 2022). Nevertheless, institutional campuses comprise diverse building typologies with highly disparate thermal distribution constraints, operational schedules, and hydrological characteristics.

Selecting appropriate configurations requires balancing specific technological options, including dual-source systems, ambient loops, and groundwater heat exchange, against envelope readiness and local electrical grid capacities (Reda & Sanner, 2012; Tang et al., 2026). Without structured spatial and technical prioritization frameworks, capital allocations risk suboptimal carbon displacement or costly distribution mismatch during execution.

This project establishes a systematic spatial priority framework for phasing heat-pump installations across campus real estate. By integrating building thermal envelope data, central infrastructure topology, and multi-source heat availability, the resulting decision support model optimizes technical feasibility, capital sequence, and cumulative emissions reduction across institutional assets (Rivoire et al., 2022; Tang et al., 2026).

5. Recommendations and Phased Rollout Priorities

Implementing campus-scale heating electrification demands a structured ranking mechanism that coordinates building fabric readiness with available thermal sources. High-temperature distribution loops connected to legacy gas boilers present immediate integration challenges when transitioning to low-temperature thermodynamic cycles [2]. Consequently, prioritization must favor building clusters where hydronic emitters can operate at lower supply temperatures without compromising occupant comfort. Dual-source systems and wastewater-source ambient loops provide viable operational pathways in complex urban layouts where land availability restricts extensive borehole arrays [1], [3]. Evaluating facilities based on proximity to auxiliary heat sinks, current envelope insulation quality, and local sub-station electrical head-room ensures that initial capital outlays achieve significant carbon abatement while avoiding grid overload [2], [3]. Facilities with heavy continuous base loads, such as centralized athletic complexes or wet laboratories, should be staged alongside compatible ambient loop networks to maximize seasonal performance coefficients [1]. This layered decision rubric allows campus facilities directors to deploy capital in clear phases, securing rapid early decarbonization gains while preparing older structures for deep envelope retrofits.

References

  1. Techno-Economic Analysis of a Swimming Pool Heating System Retrofitting Through a Dual Source Heat Pump
    Dino, Giuseppe Edoardo, Palomba, Valeria, Frazzica, Andrea et al.
    DOI-Link
  2. Simulation-based Evaluation of Air-Source Heat Pump Retrofit to Phase-out Condensing Gas Boilers. Case Study of Campus Building in Ireland
    Larkin, Gavin, Blanes Restoy, Luis Miguel, Keane, Marcus
    DOI-Link
  3. Novel Heat Pump-Based Energy Systems for Decarbonization of Cold-Climate Urban Campus Buildings with Case Studies of T.M.U. Campus
    Monica Brands
    DOI-Link
  4. Non-residential groundwater-heat-pump retrofit demonstration. Final report
    A. Hildebrandt, J. Bentley, A. Ibrahim
  5. Groundwater heat pump selection for high temperature heating retrofit
    Dragi Lj. Antonijević, Dimitrije J. Manić, Mirko S. Komatina et al.
  6. Data-driven heat pump retrofit analysis in residential buildings: Carbon emission reductions and economic viability
    Daniel R. Bayer, Marco Pruckner

Bibliographie

Geprüfte QuellenFormatierungsstandardsHohe EinzigartigkeitPro-Modelle
Launch Offer -25%

Projekt

APA 7

EUR 6EUR 7
  • 10–20 Seiten
  • Hohe Originalität
  • Export nach Word
  • Korrekte Formatierung
  • Öffentliche Vorschau
    Die Vorschau eines anderen Autors kann nicht privat gemacht werden. Deine Arbeit wird privat und absolut einzigartig sein.
  • Literaturverzeichnis (8+, APA 7)
    +EUR 1
  • Alternative Quellen hinzufügen (Nachrichten, .gov, .edu)

Projekt

APA 7